Direct Teams alternative comparison

WebChat vs Chat365: which Teams chat workflow fits?

Both candidates centre website enquiries on Microsoft Teams, but their public documentation highlights different routing and service features.

Fact-checked: 4 Verified sources

Scenario decision

Microsoft-stack depth or documented service operations

WebChat describes a visitor request as a post in the responsible Teams channel and an agent reply from the thread. Chat365’s Marketplace listing mentions acceptance, rejection, routing and mentions, plus retaining conversations in Teams.

These are vendor claims, not results from our own hands-on test. A symmetric proof of concept must show ownership, transfers, concurrent replies and mobile handling.

Sources: 2, 1, 4

Documented differences

Compare what the current sources actually state

CriterionWebChatChat365
Agent workflowchannel post and thread reply documentedTeams-based acceptance, routing and mentions in Marketplace
Website chatwidget routed to a configured channelwebsite and web-app chat
Service operationrouting to Teams channelsservice hours and offline answers explicitly mentioned
Mediasocial-messaging channels claimedfiles, screenshots and meetings explicitly mentioned
User logicper channel with unlimited users per channel claimedunlimited team members and conversations claimed
Numeric pricenot independently verifiednot found publicly in the reviewed source

Sources: 1, 3, 4

Selection rules

Which candidate should enter the proof first?

  • WebChat first: Entra SSO, Power Platform or WhatsApp, Instagram and TikTok are part of the target design.
  • Chat365 first: service hours, offline replies, screenshots, files or meetings are mandatory.
  • Test both: agents must handle website chat in Teams without a separate day-to-day inbox.
  • Choose another category: voice, workforce management and contact-centre reporting are core requirements.

Procurement control

Use identical tasks and quote assumptions

  1. 01

    Same routes

    Send sales, support and escalation from the same three widget entry points.

  2. 02

    Same load

    Test concurrent chats, agent transfer, offline service and Teams Mobile.

  3. 03

    Same quote

    Request identical channels, sites, languages, agents, messages and add-ons.

  4. 04

    Same governance

    Ask for DPA, hosting, retention, roles, export and support evidence.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Chat365 an alternative to Microsoft Teams Live Chat?

Its Marketplace listing describes website chat with handling, routing and history in Teams. A proof of concept should verify whether the exact workflow fits.

Is WebChat cheaper than Chat365?

There is no basis for that claim without symmetric current quotes. Compare the same channels, websites, languages, agents and add-ons.

Which product documents more social channels?

WebChat mentions WhatsApp, Instagram and TikTok. The reviewed Chat365 source focuses on website chat and service/media features; confirm any additional channels separately.

Does either product replace a contact centre?

Do not assume so. Voice, workforce management, strict queues and comprehensive reporting require a separate category review.

Verified sources

Sources and review date

  1. 01
    WebChat by inwebco GmbH

    Microsoft Marketplace / inwebco GmbH · Fact-checked:

    Open source
    verified
  2. 02
    Wirklich nativ in Microsoft Teams – statt nur eingebettet

    inwebco GmbH · Fact-checked:

    Open source
    verified
  3. 03
    Setting Up WebChat: The Complete Guide for Microsoft Teams

    inwebco GmbH · Fact-checked:

    Open source
    verified
  4. 04
    Chat365 for Teams: Your Communication Hub

    Microsoft Marketplace / AGEVIS · Fact-checked:

    Open source
    review note